Market Update: Pricing Momentum Shifts to Technology

August CPI and PPI rebounded, largely driven by oil, while technology showed more durable pricing improvement. Electronics prices strengthened further, alongside an 18.5% year-on-year rise in sector profits in January–July. As the recovery remains concentrated, we continue to favour targeted exposure to the technology and electronics chain rather than a broad reflation trade.

Ian Li Qingcao,CFA
Ian Li Qingcao,CFA14 Sep 2026 144 Views
Market Update: Pricing Momentum Shifts to Technology

  • Headline inflation remains oil-driven: July energy weakness pulled CPI to 0.5% and PPI to 3.5%; August’s petrol rebound reversed the move, lifting CPI to 0.8% and PPI to 3.8%.
  • Technology pricing keeps accelerating: Electronic equipment PPI rose from 3.3% to 4.4% and 5.3% across June–August. Electrical machinery moved from 5.1% to 5.9% over the same period.
  • Price gains are reaching consumers: Tablet, computer and mobile phone prices rose 21.5%, 19.6% and 11.0% year-on-year in August, which the statistics bureau attributed to computing demand.
  • Pricing strength is translating into earnings: Electronics-sector profits rose 18.5% year-on-year in January–July, over 80% of the industry’s total profit increase.
  • The recovery remains narrow: Automotive factory-gate prices are still negative and general consumer goods show no inflection. This supports targeted technology exposure rather than a broad reflation trade.

Data Overview

August CPI rose 0.4% month-on-month after a 0.1% decline in July, lifting the year-on-year rate to 0.8%. Core CPI recovered to 1.0%. PPI rose 0.4% month-on-month against a 0.7% fall, widening year-on-year growth to 3.8%. Headline readings completed a full round trip in two months. The structural readings held one direction throughout, and matter more for investors.

Indicator Aug-26 Jul-26 Comment
CPI (YoY) 0.80% 0.50% Rebound driven by wider energy price gains
Core CPI (YoY) 1.00% 0.90% Stable near 1%; domestic demand pricing steady
CPI (MoM) 0.40% -0.10% Turned positive; petrol contributed c.0.21pp
PPI (YoY) 3.80% 3.50% Widened on imported factors and technology demand
PPI (MoM) 0.40% -0.70% Turned positive
Electronic equipment PPI (YoY) 5.30% 4.40% Second month of acceleration — the core signal
Source: National Bureau of Statistics, compiled by iFAST Research
Data as at August 2026


Headline Inflation Is Still Oil-Driven

Oil explains most of the July–August swing. In July, transport fuel prices fell from 15.3% to 0.8% year-on-year, dragging both CPI and PPI lower. In August, petrol rose 7.2% month-on-month and 9.3% year-on-year, adding roughly 0.28pp to headline CPI. On the PPI side, oil extraction, refining, organic chemicals and non-ferrous smelting together contributed about 0.31pp to the monthly increase.

The two months moved in opposite directions because of the same driver. Headline inflation therefore provides limited information on domestic demand. Core CPI is the stable series: 1.0%, then 0.9%, then 1.0% again. Domestic demand pricing neither weakened in July nor strengthened in August.

This is consistent with our Q2 GDP review. An energy mix dominated by coal and renewables, diversified supply and ample strategic reserves dilute the pass-through from crude oil into domestic prices. The dilution works in both directions.

Technology Pricing Continues to Accelerate

Technology prices moved one way while headline readings swung. Electronic equipment PPI rose from 3.3% to 4.4% to 5.3%, and electrical machinery from 5.1% to 5.7% to 5.9%. Both accelerated through the July decline and the August rebound. Month-on-month, electronic circuit manufacturing rose 3.5% and virtual reality equipment 1.9%. Notably, the statistics bureau cited demand from industrial upgrading alongside imported factors as the two key drivers of the August PPI increase.

Price gains have now reached consumers. Mobile phone, tablet and data storage prices each rose above 2% month-on-month in August, attributed to computing demand. Memory price increases had previously appeared only at the factory gate; this is the first time they register in consumer prices.

This matters for the margin question. Upstream price increases are a cost for domestic device assembly, not a benefit. Consumer prices rising in parallel indicates costs are being passed through, so margin compression risk is smaller than we previously estimated. Whether end-price increases hold depends on demand tolerance, which subsequent data will test.

Pricing Strength Is Reaching Earnings

Prices are not the conclusion; profits are. Electronics-sector profits rose 18.5% year-on-year in January–July, over 80% of the industry’s total profit increase, concentrated in computing and memory chip manufacturing. Pricing strength is now translating into earnings.

Index data points the same way. The CSI All-Share Information Technology Index posted Q1 revenue growth of 20% and earnings growth of 74%. With capacity fixed and costs relatively rigid, most incremental revenue settles as profit. This profit sensitivity is the core mechanism behind hardware earnings in this cycle. Continued price acceleration suggests it persists into the next reporting period, though industrial profits are cumulative and lagged, so monthly prices do not map mechanically onto quarterly earnings.

Tencent Cloud provides company-level confirmation. It raised prices on selected services in May, citing higher storage costs. The pass-through shows improving pricing power at the platform level. Together with August consumer electronics prices, cost pass-through is now visible in both services and physical goods.

Evidence pointing the other way should be noted. Automotive factory-gate prices remain negative and rank among the main PPI drags, alongside electricity and heat, non-metallic minerals and pharmaceuticals. Food prices are still down 1.4%. Pricing power is converging into a few segments rather than recovering across manufacturing. Our portfolio conclusions are narrow for that reason.

Price Composition Matters for Earnings

For equity investors, composition matters more than level, because it determines who owns the profit. Oil-driven increases transfer profit from mid- and downstream manufacturers to upstream resource holders and overseas producers; listed Chinese companies are net payers in aggregate. Technology-driven increases retain profit onshore, concentrated in the electronics and equipment chains we focus on.

July and August differed in support, not in level. The energy contribution was negative then positive and largely offsetting. The technology contribution was positive in both months and widened. Stripping out energy noise, the direction of improvement is unambiguous.

Policy Implications: Look Beyond One Month

We argued in our Q2 GDP review that a positive deflator produces passive easing through real interest rates, reducing the need for active cuts. July partly reversed that mechanism; August partly restored it. The round trip shows why single-month prices are a poor guide to policy.

The structural conditions supporting easing have not changed. Price swings are driven by imported factors, which the central bank treats as supply shocks; firms facing cost compression need targeted support more, not less. Bank net interest margins remain at historical lows, and large-scale policy bond issuance requires low rates. The renminbi issue is the pace of appreciation, not depreciation pressure.

Quantitative tools have returned to the official toolkit and offer more flexibility than rate cuts, so they will likely come first. What matters for equities is whether the discount rate path remains downward. Recent data has not changed it. With global rates rising and domestic rates falling, onshore technology assets gain a relative valuation advantage alongside improving earnings.

Risk Factors

  • Oil-price volatility: A renewed oil spike could compress downstream margins and constrain policy flexibility, while a sharp decline would weaken headline reflation.
  • Narrow price recovery: Automotive and general consumer goods show no inflection and food prices remain negative. Stalled supply-side consolidation would make price improvement uneven.
  • Sustainability of end-price increases: Consumer electronics price gains are cost-driven. If demand tolerance is insufficient, higher prices may come at the expense of volumes.
  • Global AI capex and the memory cycle: Electronic equipment prices sit downstream of global computing capex, with supply momentum currently ahead of demand. A capex slowdown would show up here first.

Recommended Vehicles

Our conclusion is narrow: the price recovery is real and reaching earnings, but concentrated in electronics and equipment. With sub-sector rotation sharp and timing costly, high-purity broad-based vehicles remain more robust than single-stock selection. The three below correspond to the three links in the evidence chain.

Vehicle Ticker Market / Domicile Benchmark Index Evidence
GF CSI All-Share IT ETF 159939.SZ Shenzhen Stock Exchange CSI All-Share Information Technology Index Electronic equipment PPI and sector profits
iShares Hang Seng TECH ETF 3067.HK Hong Kong Stock Exchange Hang Seng Tech Index Cloud cost pass-through
T. Rowe Price Funds SICAV – China Evolution Equity Fund LU2187417386 Luxembourg (UCITS) MSCI China All Shares Index Electrical machinery price gains
Source: Fund managers and index providers (public disclosures), compiled by iFAST Research


The GF CSI All-Share IT ETF offers the most direct exposure to the sectors where pricing and earnings are improving. Its benchmark is concentrated in electronic equipment, semiconductors and related hardware.

The iShares Hang Seng TECH ETF captures the platform side of the chain. Improving cost pass-through at cloud providers points to better pricing power and unit economics, which domestic price statistics do not capture and valuations do not yet reflect.

The T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity Fund broadens exposure beyond pure IT into industrial and equipment segments where pricing is also improving. It holds industrials and commercial services well above benchmark weight.

These positions correspond to a medium- to long-term view. Transmission from prices into revenue and profit typically takes several quarters, and monthly price volatility is not a basis for revising the framework. Investors can set relative weightings according to their own risk tolerance and horizon.

Related Articles

China's 2Q GDP slowed, but AI and Semiconductors are driving the next growth cycle 

China’s AI hardware opportunity: Global compute boom meets accelerating domestic substitution

China's Monetary Policy Outlook: Will easing return in 2H2026?

AI inflection point meets policy tailwinds: Capturing Chinese technology beta


Disclaimer

Important Notice

This report has been prepared by the iFAST China Research team for general information purposes and is intended for public distribution. It does not constitute, and should not be construed as, an offer, solicitation, or investment recommendation to buy or sell any securities, funds, or investment products, and does not take into account the investment objectives, financial situation, or specific needs of any particular recipient.

The information, views, projections and estimates contained in this report are based on publicly available information and independent judgement that the team considers reliable; however, the Company makes no express or implied warranties as to their accuracy, completeness, or timeliness. Forward-looking statements in this report are subject to uncertainty, and actual results may differ materially from those expressed.

Past performance is not indicative of future returns. The value of investments and any income derived from them may fall as well as rise, and investors may not recover the amount originally invested. Where investments are denominated in a foreign currency, exchange rate movements may also adversely affect the value of the investment.

Investors should independently and carefully assess the relevant risks before making any investment decision, and should seek independent financial, legal, or tax professional advice as appropriate to their individual circumstances.

The Company and related licensed entities within the iFAST Group (including iFAST Platform Limited (IFPL) and others) are regulated by the relevant supervisory authorities in their respective jurisdictions. For further information about the Company and this report, please visit the official iFAST website.

Analyst Disclosure

As at the date of publication of this report, the author Ian Li, CFA, and his immediate family members hold no position or interest (NIL) in any of the securities or investment products referred to in this report. The author’s compensation is not directly linked to the specific views expressed in this report.

Artificial Intelligence Disclosure

This report may have used AI-assisted tools in the course of drafting, data compilation, and chart preparation. All outputs have been independently reviewed and verified by the research team.

All materials and contents found in this site are strictly for general circulation and informational purposes only and should not be considered as an offer, or solicitation, to deal in any of the funds or products found/identified in this site. While iFAST Financial Pte Ltd ("IFPL") has tried to provide accurate and timely information, there may be inadvertent delays, omissions, technical or factual inaccuracies and typographical errors. Any opinion or estimate contained in this report is made on a general basis and neither IFPL nor any of its servants or agents have given any consideration to nor have they or any of them made any investigation of the investment objective, financial situation or particular need of any user or reader, any specific person or group of persons. You should consider carefully if the products you are going to purchase are suitable for your investment objective, investment experience, risk tolerance and other personal circumstances. If you are uncertain about the suitability of the investment product, please seek advice from a financial adviser, before making a decision to purchase the investment product. Past performance is not indicative of future performance. The value of the investment products and the income from them may fall as well as rise. Opinions expressed herein are subject to change without notice. In respect of any matters arising from, or in connection with the said research analyses or research reports, recipients of the report are to contact IFPL at 10 Collyer Quay, #26-01 Ocean Financial Centre Building, Singapore 049315, or by telephone at +65 6557 2853. Where the report contains research analyses or research reports from a foreign research house and if the recipient of such research analyses or research reports is not an accredited investor, expert investor, institutional investor or an ex-accredited investor, IFPL accepts legal responsibility for the contents of such analyses or reports to such persons only to the extent as required by law. Please note that only certain security(ies) herein are available to all investors, while the rest are only available for certain persons to invest in, such as Accredited Investors (as defined in the Securities and Futures Act) or one who invests at least S$200,000 (or its equivalent currency) per transaction. To qualify as an Accredited Investor, one needs to submit a declaration form and certain relevant supporting documents, according to iFAST’s prevailing policies and procedures.

Please read our full disclaimers on the website at ( https://fsm.global/sg/policies/328125/investment-account-terms-&-conditions).

iFAST Financial Pte Ltd (IFPL) (registered address: 10 Collyer Quay #26-01 Ocean Financial Centre Singapore 049315, Telephone: 6557 2000) holds the Financial Advisers Licence issued by the Monetary Authority of Singapore ('MAS') to conduct regulated activities of advising on securities, marketing of collective investment schemes and arranging of any contract of insurance in respect of life policies, other than a contract of reinsurance and the Capital Markets Services Licence issued by the MAS to conduct regulated activities of dealing in securities and providing custodial services for securities. While IFPL has made every effort to ensure the independence of the report's contents, IFPL's nature of business is such that IFPL and its connected and associated entities together with their respective directors, officers and staff may be involved in providing dealing or investment-related services in the abovementioned securities, and have taken or may take positions in the securities mentioned in this report, and may also act as the principal for any buy or sell trades.