US PCE inflation stalls at 3.7%: What it means for portfolio positioning

US inflation remains well above the Fed’s 2% target, with several upside risks potentially keeping rates higher for longer. We assess what sticky inflation and signs of softer consumer momentum mean for portfolio positioning.

Joel Phua
Joel Phua31 Aug 2026Views
US PCE inflation stalls at 3.7%: What it means for portfolio positioning

• July PCE and core PCE inflation held steady at 3.7% YoY and 3.3% YoY, respectively, keeping inflation well above the Fed’s 2% target.
•  Energy, food and semiconductor costs, alongside the potential for further tariff escalation, present meaningful upside risks that could keep inflation elevated in the months ahead.
•  Softening consumer confidence, weak real wage growth and fading support from tax refunds suggest that the strong consumption momentum seen in 1H26 may be difficult to sustain.
• We continue to favour quality companies and the digital economy sector, while remaining cautious on loss-making companies and consumer discretionary stocks.

US inflation, as measured by the Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) Price Index, held steady at 3.7% year-on-year (YoY) in July 2026, above expectations of 3.6% and remaining well above the Federal Reserve’s 2% target. On a monthly basis, headline PCE inflation accelerated to 0.2% from -0.1% in June, exceeding expectations of a 0.1% month-on-month (MoM) increase.

Core PCE inflation, which excludes the volatile food and energy components, likewise held steady at 3.3% YoY, in line with expectations. On a monthly basis, core PCE inflation rose to 0.2% from 0.1% in June, also in line with expectations.

Goods inflation was unchanged at 3.7% YoY, with furnishings and durable household equipment easing (0.4% vs. 1.5%), while recreational goods and vehicles accelerated (8.6% vs. 2.3%). Gasoline and other energy goods also moderated slightly (25.1% vs. 26.3%).

Services inflation was similarly unchanged, with housing (3.2% YoY vs. 3.2%), healthcare (3.0% vs. 3.0%), and food services (3.4% vs. 3.4%) remaining stable. Transportation services, meanwhile, edged lower to 7.1% from 7.3%.

Figure 1: US inflation remains unchanged

Multiple forces could keep inflation elevated

July’s PCE data reinforces our view that the path towards the Fed’s 2% inflation target is likely to be a prolonged one. While headline inflation remains below its recent peak of 4.1% in May, it has stalled at 3.7% rather than continuing its downward trajectory. The lack of progress is even more apparent in core inflation, which has remained around 3.3% since March. As Fed Chair Kevin Warsh highlighted at the recent Jackson Hole conference, underlying inflation trends have not meaningfully improved, with 54% of PCE components recording price increases above 3%, compared with just 32% in the two decades preceding the COVID-19 pandemic.

Looking ahead, we see several factors that could keep inflation elevated and make the journey towards the Fed’s 2% target challenging.

Energy prices remain a key upside risk. The reopening of the Strait of Hormuz remains highly uncertain, with the US-Iran negotiations at an impasse. Both crude oil and fuel prices remain above pre-war levels. Importantly, even if hostilities were to end and crude oil prices declined, fuel prices could remain elevated in the near term due to refining bottlenecks. Refineries in the Gulf have been damaged by the US-Iran conflict, while Russian refining capacity has also been disrupted by Ukrainian drone strikes. With less refining capacity available, the supply of refined petroleum products remains constrained, keeping fuel prices elevated relative to crude oil. This is reflected in elevated crack spreads, which measure the price differential between refined petroleum products and crude oil.

Food and semiconductor costs could also serve as additional sources of inflationary pressure. Food production is being affected by a combination of adverse weather, geopolitical conflicts, and higher fertiliser and fuel costs, pushing the UN Food and Agriculture Organization’s Food Price Index to a three-year high of 131.1 in July.

Meanwhile, rising memory chip prices are increasing the cost of everyday electronics as the rapid build-out of AI data centres intensifies demand for semiconductors. This pressure could be exacerbated if the Trump administration proceeds with new tariffs on semiconductors, which it is considering as part of efforts to encourage greater investment in US chip manufacturing. Politico reported last week that the tariffs under consideration could extend beyond semiconductors themselves to goods that contain them, including laptops, gaming consoles, and data-centre servers.

Related article: The Middle East ceasefire is dead. Rates are likely to stay higher for longer.

Beyond semiconductors, the broader tariff landscape also warrants attention. The US has imposed a 50% tariff on a range of Canadian goods under the previously unused Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930, following the collapse of US-Canada trade talks. However, the affected imports totalled just USD 20.2 billion in 2025, equivalent to 5.3% of the USD 382 billion of goods the US imported from Canada and less than 0.6% of total US goods imports. The Yale Budget Lab estimates that the average statutory tariff rate will rise from 11.0% currently to 11.8% by year-end based on scheduled tariff increases, or 11.5% excluding the Section 338 tariffs on Canada. Given the relatively small share of imports affected, we expect the latest measures to have only a modest impact on overall economic activity and inflation.

That said, the greater risk lies in further escalation. Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney has announced dollar-for-dollar retaliation beginning September 8, while President Donald Trump has threatened to raise tariffs on Canadian automotive goods to 50% from January 1. Risks of additional tariffs elsewhere also remain, with ongoing Section 301 investigations into alleged industrial overcapacity involving China and more than a dozen other economies, alongside Section 232 investigations that could result in additional product- or sector-specific tariffs on national security grounds.

In short, upside risks to inflation remain meaningful, making the path towards the Fed’s 2% target increasingly challenging. We therefore continue to see a meaningful possibility of rate hikes should inflation fail to move towards the Fed’s 2% target “clearly and at sufficient speed,” in Warsh’s words.

Related article: Jackson Hole takeaway: Inflation is still too high; rates are likely to stay elevated

Favour quality and structural growth in a higher-for-longer environment

In a higher-for-longer interest rate environment, we remain cautious on loss-making companies, which are more vulnerable to rising funding costs and pressure on valuation multiples. Instead, we favour quality companies with strong balance sheets, consistent earnings, and high returns on equity, as these businesses are better positioned to withstand elevated borrowing costs and a more challenging macroeconomic backdrop.

We also maintain our cautious stance on consumer discretionary stocks, where elevated inflation, higher-for-longer interest rates, and weakening consumer confidence form a difficult combination. While consumption has held up better than expected in the first half of the year, there are signs that this resilience may be beginning to fade. Inflation-adjusted consumer spending was flat MoM in July, while the Consumer Confidence Index fell to 89.4 in August from 90.2 in July, its lowest level since January, as households became more pessimistic about business conditions and the labour market over the next six months. Taken together, these indicators suggest that the strong consumption momentum seen in 1H26 may be difficult to sustain.

Corporate earnings calls echo this tension between resilience and strain. Visa CFO Chris Suh struck a more upbeat tone, noting that both discretionary and non-discretionary spending volumes remained strong, with no signs of weakening among lower-spending consumers. Walmart offered a more tempered view, observing that the consumer environment was softer than in February, with many households becoming more deliberate in managing their budgets. The strain is particularly evident in big-ticket categories, with Home Depot and Lowe's continuing to flag weak demand for large-scale home improvement projects. We expect this weakness to persist, as high interest rates continue to keep financing and mortgage costs elevated, making large-ticket purchases increasingly difficult for households to afford.

Importantly, consumer surveys point to further moderation in spending ahead. McKinsey’s ConsumerWise research, conducted in late July and early August, found that a greater share of consumers intended to spend less across most discretionary categories over the next three months compared with the previous quarter. This more cautious outlook is reinforced by mounting pressure on household purchasing power. Average gasoline prices remain above USD 4 per gallon, while the boost from higher-than-usual tax refunds that supported spending earlier in the year is likely to fade as most refunds have now been paid out. Real wage growth also remains weak, with real average hourly earnings declining 0.2% YoY in July, while real disposable personal income grew by only 0.5% YoY. With purchasing power under pressure and temporary supports to spending fading, consumers have less capacity to absorb persistently elevated prices without cutting back on discretionary spending. That said, we do not expect a collapse in consumer spending, given a stable labour market and continued spending by high-income households.

Against this backdrop of consumer caution, we remain constructive on the digital economy where structural tailwinds from AI adoption and sustained infrastructure investment continue to support long-term earnings growth, providing  greater resilience to macroeconomic headwinds. While rising capital expenditure has weighed on investor sentiment towards Big Tech, these companies continue to deliver strong earnings growth, and we view current valuations as attractive relative to their growth trajectory.

Related articleBig Tech earnings 2Q26: Demand confirmed; Higher burden of proof

Table 1: Recommended products

Sector/Style

Recommended Products

Digital Economy

•      Fidelity Global Technology A-ACC-USD

•      Eastspring Investments Unit Trusts - Global Technology SGD

•      Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF (NASDAQ: PNQI)

Quality

•      JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (NYSE: JQUA)


Declaration:

This research report was prepared with the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) tools. iFAST Financial Pte Ltd does not rely exclusively on AI for content generation; the content of this report – including all investment theses, ratings, price targets and conclusions – has been independently reviewed and verified by the research analyst(s) to ensure accuracy and professional integrity.

For specific disclosure, at the time of publication of this report, IFPL (via its connected and associated entities) and the analyst who produced this report hold a NIL position in the abovementioned securities.

All materials and contents found in this site are strictly for general circulation and informational purposes only and should not be considered as an offer, or solicitation, to deal in any of the funds or products found/identified in this site. While iFAST Financial Pte Ltd ("IFPL") has tried to provide accurate and timely information, there may be inadvertent delays, omissions, technical or factual inaccuracies and typographical errors. Any opinion or estimate contained in this report is made on a general basis and neither IFPL nor any of its servants or agents have given any consideration to nor have they or any of them made any investigation of the investment objective, financial situation or particular need of any user or reader, any specific person or group of persons. You should consider carefully if the products you are going to purchase are suitable for your investment objective, investment experience, risk tolerance and other personal circumstances. If you are uncertain about the suitability of the investment product, please seek advice from a financial adviser, before making a decision to purchase the investment product. Past performance is not indicative of future performance. The value of the investment products and the income from them may fall as well as rise. Opinions expressed herein are subject to change without notice. In respect of any matters arising from, or in connection with the said research analyses or research reports, recipients of the report are to contact IFPL at 10 Collyer Quay, #26-01 Ocean Financial Centre Building, Singapore 049315, or by telephone at +65 6557 2853. Where the report contains research analyses or research reports from a foreign research house and if the recipient of such research analyses or research reports is not an accredited investor, expert investor, institutional investor or an ex-accredited investor, IFPL accepts legal responsibility for the contents of such analyses or reports to such persons only to the extent as required by law. Please note that only certain security(ies) herein are available to all investors, while the rest are only available for certain persons to invest in, such as Accredited Investors (as defined in the Securities and Futures Act) or one who invests at least S$200,000 (or its equivalent currency) per transaction. To qualify as an Accredited Investor, one needs to submit a declaration form and certain relevant supporting documents, according to iFAST’s prevailing policies and procedures.

Please read our full disclaimers on the website at ( https://fsm.global/sg/policies/328125/investment-account-terms-&-conditions).

iFAST Financial Pte Ltd (IFPL) (registered address: 10 Collyer Quay #26-01 Ocean Financial Centre Singapore 049315, Telephone: 6557 2000) holds the Financial Advisers Licence issued by the Monetary Authority of Singapore ('MAS') to conduct regulated activities of advising on securities, marketing of collective investment schemes and arranging of any contract of insurance in respect of life policies, other than a contract of reinsurance and the Capital Markets Services Licence issued by the MAS to conduct regulated activities of dealing in securities and providing custodial services for securities. While IFPL has made every effort to ensure the independence of the report's contents, IFPL's nature of business is such that IFPL and its connected and associated entities together with their respective directors, officers and staff may be involved in providing dealing or investment-related services in the abovementioned securities, and have taken or may take positions in the securities mentioned in this report, and may also act as the principal for any buy or sell trades.