
· Policy Paradigm Shift: 2026 priorities move from supply-side tech-driven to demand-side domestic circulation-led, with a GDP range target emphasizing growth quality over speed.
· Structural Reset in Fiscal Expansion: Fiscal deficit remains at 4% for a second year, public spending surpasses RMB 30 trillion, and special bonds focus on tech and strategic projects, marking a structural fiscal baseline.
· AI Industrial Policy Enters Operational Phase: " “AI+” appears as an independent pillar, with AI Agents across industries. IT spans both emerging and future industries, combining near-term earnings visibility with long-term optionality.
· CSI 300 Opportunity: The index currently trades at approximately 13x forward PE (2026E), well below peers like US and Japan. EPS growth is set to accelerate from 9% in 2026 to 12% in 2027. Based on a fair PE of 15x, the 2028 target level is 6,285 points, implying approximately 36% upside over a three-year horizon.
· Recommended Holdings - Pure A-Share Core + Satellite Portfolio: Core position (70%): Huatai-PineBridge CSI 300 ETF (510300.SH), systematically capturing Two Sessions policy winners in a diversified manner, combining a valuation buffer with earnings growth upside. Satellite position (30%): GF CSI All Share Information Technology ETF (159939.SZ), with 96.81% sector purity to actively overweight the highest-conviction policy theme from the Two Sessions.
The 2026 National Two Sessions - comprising the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference (opened 4 March) and the National People's Congress (opened 5 March, closed 15 March) - have concluded. For overseas investors, the Two Sessions represent the moment of greatest policy transparency in China each year. Policy directions established at the December Central Economic Work Conference are formally translated here into quantifiable growth targets, fiscal budgets, and industrial policy roadmaps, providing the most authoritative guidance for capital flows throughout the year.
The 2026 Two Sessions carry two distinct strategic dimensions. First, 2026 is the opening year of the 15th Five-Year Plan (2026-2030).For the first time, the draft Five-Year Plan outline was submitted to the NPC for review, offering markets a rare five-year policy visibility window. Second, this is the first Two Sessions since US-China trade tensions materially escalated – making it a critical lens through which to observe how Beijing is reshaping domestic policy in response to external pressures.
The core policy outputs that markets focus on during the annual Two Sessions can be summarised across five dimensions:
· The GDP growth target, which anchors the macroeconomic tone for the year and directly shapes market expectations for policy intensity and corporate earnings headroom.
· The fiscal deficit ratio, which determines the government's capacity and willingness to deploy fiscal resources and is the key parameter for assessing the scale of policy expansion.
· The monetary policy stance, which clarifies the willingness and pace of deploying easing tools such as reserve requirement ratio cuts and interest rate cuts.
· The key industrial policy agenda, which points to sectors where policy dividends will be concentrated and serves as an important reference for capital allocation.
· Major legislative and institutional changes, which foreshadow medium- to long-term adjustments in regulation and market structure.
2026 Two Sessions policy interpretation: Five core signals
Overview of 2026 Two Sessions Policy Signals
|
Policy Dimension |
2026 Signal |
Change vs. Prior Years |
Market Implication |
|
GDP Target |
4.5%-5% range |
Shifted from a single number to a range format |
Quality prioritised over speed; reduces risk of excessive stimulus |
|
Fiscal Deficit Ratio |
~4% |
Held at historic high for second consecutive year (was persistently below 3% before 2023) |
Structural reset of fiscal baseline, not emergency stimulus |
|
Fiscal Scale |
Deficit RMB 5.89tn; expenditure breaks RMB 30tn for first time; ultra-long-term special bonds RMB 1.3tn |
Deficit expanded; bond scale flat vs. last year but allocation optimised |
Sustained fiscal expansion; funds concentrated in technology and strategic projects |
|
Inflation Target |
CPI ~2% |
Proactive guidance toward moderate recovery amid deflationary pressure |
Favours recovery of pricing power in consumer goods and materials sectors |
|
Monetary Policy |
Flexible and efficient use of multiple tools including RRR and interest rate cuts |
Language upgraded from "timely" to "flexible and efficient"; easing certainty has risen |
RRR and rate cuts shift from conditional tools to active deployment instruments |
|
Exchange Rate Stance |
Will not seek trade competitive advantage through RMB depreciation |
Proactive policy constraint in context of rising trade tensions |
Narrows downside tail risk for RMB |
|
Industrial Policy |
"AI+" written in as standalone entry; AI Agent rollout mandated across all industries; dual-tier sector list |
Shift from directional statements to itemised implementation |
Information technology is the only sector spanning both the emerging pillar and future industries dual-tier framework |
▎GDP target: Flexible range replaces rigid number
China’s 2026 GDP growth target has been set at a range of 4.5%-5%. The adoption of a range rather than a single number reflects a maturation of policy communication. Having successfully achieved the 5% growth target in 2025, with total output breaking through RMB 140 trillion for the first time, policymakers no longer need to reply on a rigid number to prove growth capacity.
The use of a range target signals a clear shift in focus from growth speed to growth quality, while also reducing the risk of over-stimulating the economy in pursuit of a single numerical target.
▎Fiscal policy: 4% Deficit ratio solidified as the new normal
The fiscal deficit ratio has been maintained at approximately 4% for the second consecutive year. It is worth noting that China's fiscal deficit ratio had persistently below 3% through 2023 and earlier years. Two consecutive years at 4% means this is no longer emergency stimulus in response to external shocks, but rather a structural reset of the fiscal policy baseline - a development that will materially change how markets price the sustainability of China's fiscal space over the coming years.
In concrete terms,the deficit has expanded from RMB 5.66 trillion in 2025 to RMB 5.89 trillion.General public budget expenditure has surpassed RMB 30 trillion for the first time; and ultra-long-term special government bonds in 2026 are held at RMB 1.3 trillion, flat with 2025, but with the refined allocation priorities.-This reflects a shift from "effective" to "efficient" and from "scaling up" to "improving quality," with funds concentrated in technology innovation and major strategic projects.
▎Inflation target: Proactively guiding moderate inflation recovery
The CPI growth target has been set at approximately 2%. Against a backdrop of persistently weak consumer prices in recent years, this is a meaningfully directional positive signal. If achieved, it would bring a substantive moderate inflation recovery, supportive of the restoration of pricing power among leading consumer goods and materials companies.
▎Monetary policy: The easing toolkit made more explicit
The monetary policy language has been changed from "timely reserve requirement ratio and interest rate cuts" to "flexible and efficient use of multiple policy tools including reserve requirement ratio and interest rate cuts." This shift in language means that RRR and rate cuts have moved from conditional tools to active deployment instruments, and the certainty of policy easing has risen significantly. At the same time, the People's Bank of China has stated explicitly that it will not seek trade competitive advantage through RMB depreciation, providing a policy backstop for exchange rate stability and effectively reducing the tail risk of holding RMB-denominated assets for overseas investors.
▎Industrial policy: From directional statements to itemised implementation
"AI+" has been written into the Government Work Report for the first time as an independent economic concept, with explicit directives for AI Agents to be deployed across all industries - the most operationally specific AI policy language in any Two Sessions to date.
The industrial policy architecture has also become clearer in its tiered design:
· Emerging Pillar Industries (near-term investment priorities with commercial monetisation capability): integrated circuits, aerospace, biopharmaceuticals, low-altitude economy, new energy vehicles, and advanced equipment.
· Future Industries (long-term strategic development and frontier technology incubation): brain-computer interfaces, quantum technology, embodied intelligence, 6G, and future energy.
This dual-tier classification framework - combining near-term earnings certainty with long-term option value - provides a clear policy roadmap for capital allocation across China's technology supply chain.
Sector Outlook: Two Sessions Policy
Information Technology - The highest policy density sector
Information technology has emerged as the most heavily emphasised sector in this year's Two Sessions. The debut of "AI+" as a standalone policy pillar, the explicit mandate for AI Agent rollout across all industries, the designation of ultra-large-scale intelligent computing clusters as new infrastructure, and the promotion of AI PCs, AI smartphones, and intelligent industrial equipment together mark an unprecedented level of policy focus.
From a medium- to long-term perspective, information technology is uniquely positioned as the only sector spanning both the emerging pillar industries and future industries tiers, while areas such as integrated circuits and AI applications contributing near-term earnings certainty, and quantum technology, brain-computer interfaces, and 6G provide long-term option value. Policy support is set to t extend across the entire 15th Five-Year Plan cycle, reinforcing its role as a central pillar of China’s economic transformation.
Financials - Dual beneficiary of the easing cycle and capital market reform
The explicit pivot of monetary policy toward proactive easing is an important policy catalyst for the financial sector. While interest rate cuts will exert some near-term pressure on banks' net interest margins, policymakers are simultaneously offsetting this by guiding deposit rates lower, helping to stabilise margins. At the same time, improved liquidity conditions should support a broader repricing of financial assets.
Equally important is the acceleration in capital market reform. The imminent launch of ChiNext reforms, the first-ever inclusion of private equity exit channels in the Government Work Report, and the formal establishment of a national-level M&A fund collectively and systematically improve the operating environment for the financial sector, providing a clear positive for investment banking and asset management businesses.
With valuations near historical lows and dividend yields remaining attractive, the financial sector continues to provide both a valuation floor and income buffer for the broader market.
Industrials - Supply-side consolidation driven by anti-involution policy
“Anti-involution” has emerged as one of the most important policy themes from this year's Two Sessions deserving deeper analysis. Policymakers have explicitly called for an accelerated exit of inefficient capacity through administrative means including environmental standards enforcement, capacity regulation, and price oversight - essentially driving a new round of supply-side structural consolidation.
History suggests that this type of policy-guided industry consolidation can be highly effective. The 2016 supply-side reform in sectors like steel and coal led to a sustained recovery in pricing power and profit margins for industry leaders. At the same time, aerospace and the low-altitude economy have been explicitly designated as emerging pillar industries, providing an independent policy beta for the high-end manufacturing direction within the industrials sector.
Materials - An underappreciated supply-side beneficiary
The investment case for the materials sector under the “anti-involution” policy closely mirrors that of the industrials sector. Administrative capacity cuts, combined with M&A fund-supported industry consolidation, are creating the structural conditions for margin recovery among materials sector leaders.
Additionally, the infrastructure investment, driven by RMB 1.3 trillion in ultra-long-term special government bonds, is set to generate substantial downstream materials demand, providing demand-side support for volume expansion in the sector.
Despite these tailwinds, the market has paid relatively little attention to the sector. Compared with information technology and financials, policy support for materials remains underappreciated, leaving the supply-side consolidation story both intact and potentially mispriced.
CSI 300 Upside Potential

|
CSI 300 (000300.SH) |
2025E |
2026E |
2027E |
2028E |
|
PE |
14.3 |
13.1 |
11.7 |
11.1 |
|
EPS Growth |
6% |
9% |
12% |
6% |
|
EPS |
1.14 |
1.24 |
1.39 |
1.47 |
|
3-Year Upside
Potential (based on fair PE of 15x) |
|
|
|
36% |
|
Target Level |
|
|
|
6,285 |
Earnings growth trajectory for the CSI 300 index is forecasted to strengthen, with earnings per share growth forecast at 9% in 2026, accelerating further to 12% in 2027 – reflecting a typical early-cycle earnings recovery profile.
Using a fair PE of 15x as the valuation anchor and applying it to the forecasted 2028 EPS of RMB 1.47, the implied index target level is approximately 6,285 points, representing approximately 36% upside potential from current levels over an approximately three-year investment horizon.
Recommended Holdings: Pure A-Share Core + Satellite Portfolio
The policy themes from this year's Two Sessions - fiscal expansion, "AI+" industrial deployment, anti-involution supply-side consolidation, and robust domestic market construction - are fundamentally designed to operate within mainland Chinese economy. Understanding this is critical when selecting investment vehicles.
Policy transmission flows most directly to A-share companies: fiscal spending is allocated to mainland entities, subsidies and procurement contracts are issued by domestic regulators, and consumption recovery is driven by local households. These effects are therefore most clearly reflected in the revenues and earnings of onshore-listed firms. By contrast, accessing similar exposure via Hong Kong-listed red chips or offshore ADRs introduces additional corporate and legal layers, which can dilute the immediacy and magnitude of policy benefits.
Positioning in A-shares effectively places investors at the source of this policy transmission chain, rather than at its downstream end.
From a currency perspective, A-shares are RMB-denominated, implying FX exposure for international investors. However, the People's Bank of China has signalled that it does not intend to pursue competitive depreciation of the RMB, helping to limit downside currency risks. For those concerned, hedging tools — both onshore and offshore — remain available to manage exposure.
Core Position: Huatai-PineBridge CSI 300 ETF (510300.SH)
Fund Manager Background: Huatai-PineBridge Fund Management Co., Ltd. is a joint venture fund management company between Huatai Securities and PineBridge Investments. Huatai Securities is one of China's largest full-service brokerages; PineBridge Investments is an international asset manager with over USD 170 billion in assets under management globally. Huatai-PineBridge is one of the leading ETF managers in China's ETF market, and 510300 is one of the largest equity ETFs by AUM in the A-share market, with the liquidity depth required for institutional-scale capital deployment.
Investment Rationale: The four sectors most directly benefiting from this year's Two Sessions policy - information technology, financials, industrials, and materials - collectively account for the majority of the CSI 300 index's weighting. Holding 510300 is not a simple broad-market exposure, but a concentrated bet on the 2026 Two Sessions policy winners in a diversified manner.
Within the index, the two largest sectors create a natural balance between offense and defence. Financials, with historically low valuations and attractive dividend yields, provide downside support and income stability. In contrast, information technology offers the strongest policy tailwinds and earnings growth potential, driving upside optionality. Together, they form a well-balanced risk-return profile within a single instrument.
The current forward PE of 13.1x for 2026, with approximately 36% upside to the 6,285 target level, represents a rare risk-return profile among major global large-cap indices.
Satellite Position: GF CSI All Share Information Technology ETF (159939.SZ)
Fund manager background: GF Fund Management Co., Ltd. is one of China's largest and longest-established public fund managers, with total assets under management exceeding RMB 1.5 trillion and over two decades of experience in the fund industry. Its passive product range is among the most comprehensive in the domestic market, and 159939 has been managed continuously by the same fund manager since 2015, with notable advantages in product stability and the operational continuity required by institutional investors.
Investment rationale: Information technology stands out as the only sector in this year's Two Sessions industrial policy to span both the emerging pillar industries and future industries tiers. It combines near-term earnings certainty (integrated circuits, AI applications) with long-term structural option value (quantum technology, brain-computer interfaces, 6G), with policy support extending across the entire 15th Five-Year Plan cycle.
159939 offers highly concentrated exposure to China’s information technology sector, with 96.81% sector purity. It spans the full value chain – from consumer electronics hardware and semiconductor chips to software and AI applications - providing a much more targeted allocation than a broad-based position in the CSI 300 Index. In effect, it represents an active overweight to the highest-conviction policy theme emerging from the Two Sessions.
On the valuation framework, while the CSI 300 offers roughly 36% upside over a three-year horizon, the CSI All Share Information Technology Index implies approximately 64% upside potential, with a target level of approximately 13,901 points. This reflects the sector's stronger earnings growth trajectory relative to the broad market.
Both recommended products are RMB-denominated A-share instruments. The portfolio as a whole requires no currency hedging overlay and introduces no additional offshore market volatility, making them suitable for overseas institutional investors seeking direct participation in China's policy dividends while avoiding the complexity of cross-border holdings.
Key Risk Factors
· Trade and Technology Policy Risk: Further escalation of US tariffs, or an expansion of AI chip export controls to a global scope, could put downward pressure on earnings forecasts for information technology sector constituents.
· Domestic Demand Policy Transmission Risk: China's official manufacturing PMI for February 2026 came in at 49.0, still below the expansion threshold, indicating that domestic demand stimulus policy remains in the transmission phase and that the conversion of policy effects into actual economic activity will take time.
· Sustained High Energy Cost Risk: If a prolonged Middle East conflict causes the oil price floor to shift persistently higher, cost pressures on manufacturing and chemical industries would evolve from a short-term shock into a structural erosion, while also pushing up imported inflation expectations, constraining the pace of monetary policy easing and thereby compressing the overall market's valuation expansion headroom.
For specific disclosure, at the time of publication of this report, the analyst who produced this report and IFPL (via its connected and associated entities) holds a NIL position in the abovementioned securities.
